RANDOM JOTTINGS


A blog about music, sports, theatre and rants





I have received numerous queries asking if I am going to do a Wimbledon Rant this year. I have, on the whole, found this year's tournament somewhat lacklustre with only the odd excitement and upset to enjoy.  I have not tuned in as assiduously as I usually do.

There was an article in the Daily Telegraph last week regarding the way the Wimbledon Committee treat the tournament and the general feeling that the actual tennis is not as important as the optics and the prestigiousness of the fortnight.   The writer of this piece also lambasted the standard of the commentary.   At the last time of looking there were around 1200 comments on the forum and with no more than half a dozen exceptions everyone was in agreement that this year the commentary has been the worst ever.

Now I have watched Wimbledon for years and the level of expertise and knowledge of the entire commentary team has really gone down.   Sue Barker, a Grand Slam winner and a woman with an incredible knowledge of the game, retired last year.  She had been replaced by the BBC on another programme she had fronted for years, much to the fury of the viewers, and she decided to retire from Wimbledon before she was edged out.   The BBC do not have much time for white women in their sixties.

She was replaced as the anchor woman by one Clare Balding who was a racing commentator and is a horse expert. She also comments on Crufts, the annual prestigious dog show. She has never played tennis, her knowledge of the game seems to be culled from google and most seem to find her acutely annoying.   But she ticks a diversity box which the Beeb are very keen on so that is that.

New to the team this year is Isa Guha who ticks two diversity boxes. She also happens to be a cricket commentator. True.   On the first day of the tournament she was heard asking if there was a difference between playing on a clay court rather than a grass one. Words fail.

The third newcomer ticks another diversity box or two and is, I gather, a presenter of children's tv. I freely admit I have never heard of him. He fronted up Wimbledon Today which used to be an interesting programme but has now turned into a Wimbledon tik tok experience with this guy roaming round the grounds wearing a shirt that looked like it could do with an iron, and burbling into a mike. He says he is a "tennis geek". Well, so am I but that does not mean I am qualified to broadcast on the game.

Then in the commentary box we have a collection of has been ex-British tennis players who have achieved very little but are resurrected every year. I call it the Knackers Yard.  The two most prominent members of this collection are Andrew Castle and John Lloyd.

Andrew Castle once took Max Wilander, in his day, to five sets on the Centre Court at Wimbledon. Andrew lost.   And that is it.  

John Lloyd – John is now an estate agent who lives in Florida.  He is wheeled out each year. He at least does have a Wimbledon title as he once won the mixed doubles. He also has the dubious distinction of being one of Chris Evert's husbands.   And that is it.

Sam Smith – I gather she is an ex Ladies No 1 from the UK. I have no recollection of her. She has a voice that would put you to sleep. And frequently does.

There is talk of Johanna Konta joining the team. Jeez kill me now.

Ok so who else do we have? Martina Navratilova, a woman for whom I have the utmost respect and admiration. Unfortunately, she never stops and has a droning voice that, like Sam Smith, can send you to sleep.

Tim Henman – he has improved over the years but still has the charisma of a newt. But he is a nice guy and he knows when to be quiet so that is an uptick for him.

Note: I should mention that at Queens, just before Wimbers, Castle and Lloyd were in full flow there and they had the addition of Kyle Edmonds, another knackered ex-Brit whose style of commentary was incredibly awful and made Henman sound like the Master of Quick Wit and Repartee.

We have John McEnroe and he is the best of the lot though that is not saying much, but he is witty and knowledgeable and of course, knows all there is to know about the game. He also used to have a great rapport with Sue.

The other American visitor who turns up with monotonous regularity is Tracy Austin.  One wit on the tennis forum I mentioned earlier says she has "the perfect voice for silent movies". It is relenting, it never gives up, it grates, it drives you to screaming pitch. The other night she was partnered with the Sam Smith mentioned above and the two of them did not give up for one moment. In fact, I wondered if they were watching the match at all.   I had to mute the sound in the end.

Well I could go on and on and on about the stupidity of the scheduling, the cut off in the evening so matches are left in the balance, the start time on the Centre Court which is purely to allow the fat cats, debenture holders and corporates time to stuff their faces and pig out on strawberries before entering and taking up their FREE seats.

And the Saturday of the first week when the Royal Box is filled with Z level Slebs who are announced portentiously by La Balding and who we all have to clap and cheer. It is toe curlingly awful and I avoid it like the plague.

Well I think that is it except I have to mention the trite and tedious interviews on court after every game when the player is asked "what does this mean to you". I long for the day when the players responds "actually I don't give a shit I just want to go off and have a shower". It will never happen of course but wouldn't it be wonderful if it did?

We are headed for the inevitable final between Djokovic and the newcomer Alcaraz (I keep calling him Alcatraz) who I am already finding annoying with his constant fist pumping.

Sick
FInally, yes really finally, Roger Federer. He may not be gracing the courts any more but he graced the Royal Box and was seated next to the Princess of Wales last week. Oh he loved it. He stood up, he waved, he preened, he soaked up the adulation. I am suprised he did not bless us all.   

He then spent most of the afternoon sucking up to POW.  The camera kept zooming in on Mrs Federer.   She did not look happy. In fact if I could have added a balloon coming out of her mouth I am pretty sure it would have said "just wait till I get you home".

Hilarious.

Posted in

17 responses to “Random Rant – Wimbledon”

  1. Margaret Powling Avatar
    Margaret Powling

    Oh, what a mess they have made of Uni Challenge! Glad someone else thinks that Amol gabbled, and he can’t even pronounce the letter H correctly: Amol, dear man, it is pronounced “aitch” not “haitch”. Someone please tell him. Dear old Paxo, and so sorry that he has Parkinson’s, at least spoke well. And the question cards have been done away with, and now all Amol has to do is stare into a little box. What a mess has been made of this formerly-excellent programme.

  2. Helen Avatar
    Helen

    Heigh ho, seem to have deleted rather than posted my comment so apologies if it turns up twice:(
    After comprehensively cocking up Wimbledon, the BBC has now turned its attention to University Challenge, a programme whose format has clearly stood the test of time (several decades’ worth in fact) & therefore clearly in need of a ‘BBC REVAMP’ words to bring tears to the eyes of anyone who’s ever endured such a thing.
    What did we get? Gabbled and garbled questioning by Amol Rajan (as bored and boring as Clare Balding and equally there for the wrong reasons), a set which appeared to have escaped from Play School & some of the dodgiest camerawork I’ve seen in a long life of BBC viewing. Dear Lord.
    We lasted ten minutes before we switched it off.
    Another great programme ruined by the Tristrams (as A.A. Gill called them) of the BBC.

  3. Elaine Avatar

    All the comms state the bleeding obvious….

  4. Elaine Avatar

    The problem with doubles is that none of the big names play so the tv don’t bother. By moving it down to best of 3 sets and making it less time consuming I think the hope is that some of the well known singles players ight then decide. I love watching the doubles.

  5. Elaine Avatar

    It would be good ifBoris could return. OK he may have a prison record but the way the BBC is going he may be in good company….

  6. Elaine Avatar

    The reaction to the comms team this year has been really strong and the general consensus is get rd of Balding and Castle. I could tolerate the rest if they go. I am not sure how the bbc can avoid the general comments voiced on line and in the pres.
    Knowing them though they will

  7. Elaine Avatar

    I am glad you enjoyed it!
    Yes I so agree re Ms Austin’s dress sense. More like Barbie than anything else
    Andrew Castle was trending on twitter so I had a look and what was being aid and was in hysterics. Some of the comments were so funny but all said get rid of him. Telegraph yesterday has an article on the appalling comms this year with ove 1000 comments from readers and we are as one
    Roger F really gets on my nerves. Thinks he is a supreme god but then if yu have spent the lat 20 years surrounded b worshippers hardly surprising

  8. Helen Avatar
    Helen

    Didn’t you just love it when Clare Balding hrlpfully pointed out that the umpire, one Fergus Murphy, was from Ireland? I’d never have guessed….

  9. Annie Weatherly-Barton Avatar
    Annie Weatherly-Barton

    I agree with what you say we’ll almost! Sam Smith is just awful, Andrew Castle is motormouth! I don’t like any of them! Never know when to stop wittering on! But I do have time for John Lloyd! As he and Wendy Turnbull one Wimbledon Mixed Doubles twice! No mean feat! It’s often forgotten sadly!
    It has however been somewhat lacklustre this year but hoping Jabeur wins ladies crown! Not interested in the Men’s match! However it is the match following the Men’s Championship I’m looking forward to, with Neal Skupski and his Dutch partner in the men’s doubles championship!
    If I had a real ranting time here it would be that I get seriously p _ s_ ed off that doubles matches are treated with such contempt by Wimbledon! Time for action methinks!!!

  10. Helen Avatar
    Helen

    Whilst I make no excuses for Boris Becker’s crimes (although I have noticed that he seems to be just about the only convicted foreign criminal we have managed to deport) or indeed his lamentable private life, I do miss him as a commentator. I don’t agree that tennis itself needs more ‘characters’ (codeword for foul-mouthed and badly behaved young men – I suspect that women shouting & swearing at the line judges & referees would get very short shrift from all concerned), I do think we need lively commentators and this year’s cohort are terminally dull. The robotic play of most of the players is quite bad enough without the robotic commentary we’re enduring this year.

  11. Margaret Powling Avatar
    Margaret Powling

    Just brilliant, Elaine! Balding … words fail me. Added to the horsey stuff she commentates on she also fronts the annual Boat Race (Oxford v. Cambridge). What the BBC and other broadcasters have failed to appreciate is that TV is a visual medium and we don’t need constant yapping to accompany what we can see is happening (a button on my remote gives explanations for the visually impaired, but whether it would work for a commentary, I don’t know).
    Tracy Austin, another with no dress sense (added to the list headed up by dear old Sue Barker – who at least knew her tennis onions – and Claire Balding). As for her voice, oh dear, words fail. I will actually be glad when it’s all over and we can get back to the usual afternoon and evening programmes, dire as they are!

  12. callmemadam Avatar

    I enjoyed reading this! Wimbledon increasingly passes me by. Isa Guha is good at cricket commentary; I had no idea they’d wheeled her out for tennis! Incredible.

  13. Helen Avatar
    Helen

    At last – the tennis rant we’ve all been waiting for!
    My feelings? – first up, La Balding. As you say a horse sport commentator (friends with dogs say she’s awful on Crufts as well), wooden (you’d think she’d never been in front of a camera before) and so obviously BORED! Ticks the diversity box, though, so best not to complain.
    Tracy Austen – yes, never shuts up and although I know it’s not the done thing to comment but really, does she HAVE to dress like a superannuated Barbie doll? yesterday we had a very short skirt (not a good idea for 60 year old knees), PUFF sleeves and RINGLETS! For the love of God, why??? Mind you, another one who needs to lose the ringlets is Sophie Raworth.
    And the men – well, there really should be a retirement home for fading tennis players where they can bore each other instead of us.
    I agree too that the tournament has been very flat this year. The only men’s player whose tennis I find interesting is Jannik Sinner & none of the women do much more than bat the ball about. As for the on court interviews after EVERY match – again, why? don’t they have press conferences?
    Then there was the Kate-Federer love in – I rather thought what Mrs. F was thinking was ‘Haven’t I endured enough bl**dy tennis matches in my life?’

  14. Margaret Avatar
    Margaret

    Couldn’t agree with you more!

  15. Southern Gal Avatar
    Southern Gal

    Darling i love your wimbledon rants.
    You know we agree to disagree about Roger. I want to stick up for him – if Princess Kate is speaking to him, she may have monopolized his attention… and Mrs F may have been feeling left out – its too bad the seating wasnt the Princess between the two of them…. ah well.
    I do feel sorry for you with your commentators, we have really good ones. even if i dont agree with them all the time, James Blake and the McEnroe brothers – although now i understand why John was missing from some of the major mens matches – he was over at the BBC! Chris Evert is great and Mary Jo and all the others (i cant remember all of them – there is a pretty decent sized group – and they ALL are very authoritative, some of them are coaches and practically all have won tournaments if not championships or played and now coach… so we get lots of very interesting tennis facts and background. i love it. often i watch just for the commentary even if i dont really care for the players.
    I agree with Alcaraz – and you know my feelings re Djokovic. so if its the two of them i may just listen to the McE brothers and not watch!
    yours in tennis!

  16. Elaine Avatar

    I could have gone on even more!

  17. Christine Harding Avatar

    My thoughts exactly! I do love your tennis rants.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from RANDOM JOTTINGS

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading